• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Xbox One vs PS4: AMD Outs Console-Like GPUs

February 13, 2014 by Stephen Daly

The R7-260 and R7-265 are comparable to the GPUs found in the Xbox One and PS4.

AMD has released GPUs which are comparable to those found in the PS4 and Xbox One. 

The Xbox One GPU is based on AMD's Bonaire design, with two CUs disabled  Now, AMD has released the exact same configuration for the PC space with the R7-260 (minus the X) for $109. The only difference would now are the GPUs' clocks – the R7 260 is clocked at 1GHz whereas Xbox One GPU comes in at 853MHz. 

For illustration purposes, check out the diagram below. In its analysis of the R7-260, The Guru of 3D writes: 

"The R7-260 is a fun, almost entry-level product that is going to allow you to game at 1280×720 to say 1600×1200. If you stick to these resolutions then you may apply good image quality settings. At an MSRP of 79 EURO + VAT (or $109 USD) however it is a fair deal. You'll be looking at perf in-between say a Radeon HD 7770 and Radeon HD 7790."

Meanwhile, the PS4's GPU has 18CUs (active) coupled to a memory bandwidth of 176GB/s. Previously we've had the 7850 as a reference but that GPU was coupled to 153GB/s memory bandwidth. However, with the R7-265 we have a new basis for comparison. Essentially a cutdown Pitcairn (16 CUs but running at higher clocks), the R7-265 is coupled with 179GB/s of memory bandwidth. 

PC Perspective notes: 

"For gamers looking at a budget of $150, the AMD Radeon R7-265 is clearly the best card you can buy today. Well, technically in the future, as it won't be for sale until the end of February or early March. If nothing else changes (ha!) between now and then, I expect the R7-265 to be the most popular choice for mainstream gamers that want performance and don't have any power consumption concerns. Running today's games at 1920×1080 with Ultra or Very High presets was completely feasible in most games. Only Crysis 3 presented a problem that would cause me to drop image quality settings. That is an incredible feat for a $150 graphics card."

Below is an analysis of the various GPUs' performance in games.

It seems that the PS4-like R7-265 offers solid performance given its low price point and may be worth paying a little extra for over the Xbox One-similar R7-260. The PS4 is more powerful on paper and that has demonstrated itself in terms of developers typically offering higher resolutions and framerates on the console compared to Xbox One but for sheer technical prowess, PC remains king as always. 

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

Terminator 2D NO FATE - Before You Buy

Terminator 2D NO FATE - Before You Buy

BIGGEST Flop of 2025? Call of Duty Apologizes & MORE

BIGGEST Flop of 2025? Call of Duty Apologizes & MORE

10 Brand NEW Games from Game Awards 2025

10 Brand NEW Games from Game Awards 2025

What The HELL IS GOING ON With Warner Bros. Games?

What The HELL IS GOING ON With Warner Bros. Games?

10 Atmospheric Games That Might CHANGE YOUR LIFE

10 Atmospheric Games That Might CHANGE YOUR LIFE

10 Games That Have Come A LONG WAY

10 Games That Have Come A LONG WAY

20+ YEAR Old Games That Still Look INSANELY Timeless

20+ YEAR Old Games That Still Look INSANELY Timeless

10 Things Players HATE In 2025

10 Things Players HATE In 2025

10 Game Award REVEALS That Would Blow Our Minds

10 Game Award REVEALS That Would Blow Our Minds

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Gears of War: E-Day Still On Schedule For 2026
  • What “Realism” Feature Do Gamers Want In GTA 6?
  • What Could Truly Be “Improved” With GTA 6’s Online Mode?
  • Epic Games Store Handing Out 17 Games For Free This Month
  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Likely To Get A Massive Resurgence

Copyright © 2025 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme